Prosocial Personality Battery

The Prosocial Personality Battery (PSB)

https://www.med.wayne.edu/fam/faculty/pdfs/30itempsbkey.pdf

Penner‚ L. A. (2002)
شخصیت از خودگذشته اجتماعی
Note to users: The best citation for this version of the Prosocial Personality Battery is: Penner‚ L. A. (2002) The Causes of Sustained Volunteerism: An Interactionist Perspective. Journal of Social Issues‚ 58‚ 447-468. Please let me know if you do use this scale.
 Please note that this version is a 30-item version of the full PSB scale. The coefficient alphas for the new versions of the individual scales (N = 1111) are:
 Social Responsibility .65
 Empathic Concern .67
 Perspective Taking .66
 Personal Distress .77
 Mutual Moral Reasoning .64
 Other Oriented Reasoning .77
 Self-reported altruism .73
 The factor structure replicates that reported in Penner et al (1995) almost perfectly (only small changes in the factor loadings).
 See: Penner‚ L. A.‚ Fritzsche‚ B. A.‚ Craiger‚ J. P.‚ & Freifeld‚ T. S. (1995). Measuring the prosocial personality. In J. N. Butcher‚ & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.) Advances in personality assessment‚ (Vol. 12). Hillsdale‚ NJ: Erlbaum.
 Below are a number of statements that may or may not describe you‚ your feelings‚ or your behavior. Please read each statement carefully and blacken in the space on your answer sheet that corresponds to choices presented below.
There are no right or wrong responses
 1= Strongly Disagree‚ 2= Disagree‚ 3= Uncertain‚ 4= Agree‚ 5= Agree Strongly
Social Responsibility (Don’t use title)
 1. When people are nasty to me‚ I feel very little responsibility to treat them well. (R)
 2. I would feel less bothered about leaving litter in a dirty park than in a clean one. (R)
 3. No matter what a person has done to us‚ there is no excuse for taking advantage of them.
 4. With the pressure for grades and the widespread cheating in school nowadays‚ the individual who cheats occasionally is not really as much at fault. (R)
 5. It doesn't make much sense to be very concerned about how we act when we are sick and feeling miserable. (R)
 6. If I broke a machine through mishandling‚ I would feel less guilty if it was already damaged before I used it. (R)
 7. When you have a job to do‚ it is impossible to look out for everybody's best interest. (R)
EMPATHY SCALE (DON’T USE TITLE)
 8. I sometimes find it difficult to see things from the "other person's" point of view. PT (R)
 9. When I see someone being taken advantage of‚ I feel kind of protective towards them. EC
 10. I sometimes try to understand my friends better by imagining how things look from their perspective. PT
 11. Other people's misfortunes do not usually disturb me a great deal. EC (R)
 12. If I'm sure I'm right about something‚ I don't waste much time listening to other people's arguments. PT (R)
 13. When I see someone being treated unfairly‚ I sometimes don't feel very much pity for them. EC (R)
 14. I am usually pretty effective in dealing with emergencies. PD (R)
 15. I am often quite touched by things that I see happen. EC
 16. I believe that there are two sides to every question and try to look at them both. PT
 17. I tend to lose control during emergencies. PD
 18. When I'm upset at someone‚ I usually try to "put myself in their shoes" for a while. PT
 19. When I see someone who badly needs help in an emergency‚ I go to pieces. PD
 PART 2:
Below are a set of statements‚ which may or may not describe how you make decisions when you have to choose between two courses of action or alternatives when there is no clear right way or wrong way to act. Some examples of such situations are: being asked to lend something to a close friend who often forgets to return things; deciding whether you should keep something you have won for yourself or share it with a friend; and choosing between studying for an important exam and visiting a sick relative. Read each statement and blacken in the space on your answer sheet that corresponds to the choices presented below.
  1= Strongly Disagree‚ 2= Disagree‚ 3= Uncertain‚ 4= Agree‚ 5= Agree Strongly
MORAL REASONING (Don’t Use Title)
 20. My decisions are usually based on my concern for other people. O
 21. My decisions are usually based on what is the most fair and just way to act. M
 22. I choose alternatives that are intended to meet everybody's needs. M
 23. I choose a course of action that maximizes the help other people receive. O
 24. I choose a course of action that considers the rights of all people involved. M
 25. My decisions are usually based on concern for the welfare of others. O
 Below are several different actions in which people sometimes engage. Read each of them and decide how frequently you have carried it out in the past. Blacken in the space on your answer sheet which best describes your past behavior. Use the scale presented below.
  1= Never‚ 2=   Once‚ 3= More than Once‚ 4= Often‚ 5= Very Often
SELF-REPORTED ALTRUISM (Don’t use title)
 26. I have helped carry a stranger's belongings (e.g.‚ books‚ parcels‚ etc.).
 27. I have allowed someone to go ahead of me in a line (e.g.‚ supermarket‚ copying machine‚ etc.)
 28. I have let a neighbor whom I didn't know too well borrow an item of some value (e.g.‚ tools‚ a dish‚ etc.).
 29. I have‚ before being asked‚ voluntarily looked after a neighbor's pets or children without being paid for it.
 30. I have offered to help a handicapped or elderly stranger across a street.
 
سایت روان سنجی: نام گذاری فارسی با عنوان "شخصیت از خودگذشته اجتماعی" به نظر نابسنده است.
Scoring Instructions:
Reverse Items with an R
Compute scores for 7 individual scales:
Social Responsibility (SR)
Empathic Concern (EC)
Perspective Taking (PT)
Personal Distress (PD)
Other-Oriented Moral Reasoning (O)
Mutual Concerns moral reasoning (M)
Self-reported altruism (SRA)
 Factor 1‚ Other-oriented empathy‚ = sum of scores on SR‚ EC‚ PT‚ O‚ M.
 Factor 2‚ Helpfulness‚ = sum of PD (total reversed*) and SRA.
 *After you have reversed the one PD item with an “R” after it‚ sum the PD items and subtract the total score on PD from 18. This makes the meaning of a high score on the Helpfulness factor clearer‚ because now high scores on the two scales both represent prosocial tendencies.
مولف درخواست کرده است درصورت به کار گیری ابزار، او را از نتایج آگاه سازید.
 Contact information:
 Louis A. Penner‚ Ph.D.
Senior Scientist‚ Communication and Behavioral Oncology Program
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Professor‚ Family Medicine
Wayne State University
5th Floor‚ Hudson Webber Cancer Research Center
4100 John R.
Detroit‚ Michigan 48201
pennerl@karmanos.org
(313) 966-8669 (Office)
(313) 966-7262 (Fax)
   
خرداد 1396
اسفند 1395
آبان 1395
فروردین 1394
خرداد 1393
فروردین 1393
اسفند 1392
بهمن 1392
دی 1390
آذر 1390
تیر 1390
خرداد 1390
اردیبهشت 1390
بهمن 1389
دی 1389
اردیبهشت 1389
دی 1388
آبان 1388
شهریور 1388
مرداد 1388
تیر 1388
خرداد 1388
   
هرکه بر ضرر مومن داستانی بگوید و قصدش عیب او و ریختن آبرویش باشد که از چشم مردم بیفتد ، خداوند اورا از دوستی خود به دوستی شیطان براند و شیطان هم او را نپذیرد : حضرت امام صادق (ع)
   
کلیه حقوق به آرین آرانی متعلق است.