Moral value Scale
Crissman‚ 1942‚ 1950; Rettig and Pasamanick‚ 1958; Rawson‚ 1961
مقیاس ارزش های اخلاقی
1. Killing a person in defense of one’s own life:
2. Kidnapping and holding a child for ransom:
3. having sex relations while unmarried:
4. Forging a check:
5. Habitually failing to keep promises:
6. Girls smoking cigarettes:
7. A n industry maintaining working conditions for its workers known to be detrimental to their health:
8. A doctor allowing a badly deformed baby to die when he could save its life but not cure its deformity:
9. A legislator‚ for a financial consideration‚ using his influence to secure the passage of a law known to be contrary to public interest:
10. Testifying falsely in court when under oath:
11. Betting on horse races:
12. A nation dealing unjustly with a weaker nation over which it has power:
13. A jury freeing a father who has killed a man for rape against his young daughter:
14. Living beyond one’s means in order to possess luxuries enjoyed by friends and associates:
15. Bootlegging under prohibition law:
16. having illicit sex relations after marriage:
17. Driving an automobile while drunk but without accident:
18. A prosperous industry paying workers less than a living wage:
19. Holding up and robbing a person:
20. Not giving to charity when able:
21. Not taking the trouble to vote at primaries and elections:
22. A strong commercial concern selling below cost to crowd out a weaker competitor:
23. Falsifying about a child’s age to secure reduced fare:
24. A student who is allowed to grade his own paper reporting a higher grade than the one earned:
25. Not giving to support religion when able:
26. Keeping over-change given by a clerk in mistake:
27. Copying from another’s paper in a school examination:
28. Speeding away after one’s car knocks down a pedestrian:
29. charging interest above a fair rate when lending money:
30. Falsifying a federal income tax return:
31. Buying bootleg liquor under prohibition law:
32. Married persons using birth - control devices:
33. Seeking divorce because of incompatibility when both parties agree to separate (assuming no children):
34. Depositing more than one ballot in an election in order to aid a favorite candidate:
35. Living on inherited wealth without attempting to render service to others:
36. Taking one’s own life (assuming no near relatives or dependents):
37. Using profane or blasphemous speech:
38. Being habitually cross or disagree able to members of one’s own family:
39. Seeking amusement on Sunday instead of going to church:
40. Refusing to bear arms in a war one believes to be unjust:
41. Advertising a medicine to cure a disease known to be in curable by such a remedy:
42. 42. Misrepresenting the value of an investment in order to induce credulous persons to invest:
43. Taking money for one’s vote in an election:
44. Newspapers treating crime news so as to make hoodlums and gangsters appear heroic:
45. A man having a vacant building he cannot rent sets it on fire to collect insurance:
46. Nations at war using poison gas on the homes and cities of its enemy behind the lines:
47. Slipping out secretly and going among people when one’s home is under quarantine for a contagious disease:
48. A man deserting a girl whom he has got into trouble without himself taking responsibility:
49. Disbelieving in God:
50. A man not marrying a girl he loves because she is markedly his inferior socially and in education:
شرح سایت روان سنجی: این مقیاس با شش عامل "کلی"، "مذهبی"، "خانوادگی"، "پیوریتتانی "، "بهره جویی سودجویانه"، "اقتصادی" و استثمارگرانه" به سنجش اخلاق می پردازد.
Factor .A‚ a general factor‚ as basic morality; factor B‚ as religious morality; factor C‚ as family morality; factor D‚ as puritanical morality; factor E‚ as exploitative- manipulative morality; and Factor F‚ as economic morality; Factor E ‚exploitative-manipulative morality
اعتبار: سایت روان سنجی اطلاعاتی ندارد.
نمره گذاری:
1= ''least wrong"‚ to 10= "least right
چگونگی دستیابی
This instrument can be found at: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1486482884008401&disposition=inline
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Crissman‚ P. (1942). Temporal changes and sexual difference in moral judgments. J. of Soc. Psychol‚ 16‚ 29-33.
Crissman‚ P. (1950). Temporal changes and sexual difference in moral /judgments. Univ. of Wyoming Publication‚ 15‚ 57-63.
Rawson‚ H. E. (1959). Maximal Prediction of Risk-Taking Behavior Using Personality and Socioeconomic Measures. Unpbl. MlA.' thesis‚ The Ohio State University
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Changes in moral values over three decades. 1929-1953. Social Problems. 6‚ 320-323.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Changes in moral values‚ among college‚ students: a factorial study. Amer. Soc. Review‚ 24‚ 356-363.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Changes in moral values as a function of adult socialization. .Social Problems‚ 7‚ 117-125.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Moral codes of American and Korean college students. J. of Soc:. Psychol‚ 50‚ 65-73.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1960). Differences in the structure of moral judgments of students and alumni. Amer. Soc. Review‚ 25. 550-555.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1960). Moral codes of American and foreign academic intellectuals in an American university. J. of Soc. Psychol‚ 51‚ 229-244.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1961). Moral value structure and social class. Sociometry‚ 24‚ 21-35.
Rawson‚ Harve Else. (1961). The relationships of moral value dimensions and Unethical behavior: under varying conditions of risk. Doctoral dissertation‚ The Ohio State University