Moral value Scale

Moral value Scale
Crissman‚ 1942‚ 1950; Rettig and Pasamanick‚ 1958; Rawson‚ 1961
مقیاس ارزش های اخلاقی
1.    Killing a person in defense of one’s own life:
2.    Kidnapping and holding a child for ransom:
3.    ha‎ving sex relations while unmarried:
4.    Forging a check:
5.    Habitually failing to keep promises:
6.    Girls smoking cigarettes:
7.    A n industry maintaining working conditions for its workers known to be detrimental to their health:
8.    A doctor allowing a badly deformed baby to die when he could save its life but not cure its deformity:
9.    A legislator‚ for a financial consideration‚ using his influence to secure the passage of a law known to be contrary to public interest:
10.    Testifying falsely in court when under oath:
11.    Betting on horse races:
12.    A nation dealing unjustly with a weaker nation over which it has power:
13.    A jury freeing a father who has killed a man for rape against his young daughter:
14.    Living beyond one’s means in order to possess luxuries enjoyed by friends and associates:
15.    Bootlegging under prohibition law:
16.    ha‎ving illicit sex relations after marriage:
17.    Driving an automobile while drunk but without accident:
18.    A prosperous industry paying workers less than a living wage:
19.    Holding up and robbing a person:
20.    Not giving to ch‎arity when able:
21.    Not taking the trouble to vote at primaries and elections:
22.    A strong commercial concern selling below cost to crowd out a weaker competitor:
23.    Falsifying about a child’s age to secure reduced fare:
24.    A student who is allowed to grade his own paper reporting a higher grade than the one earned:
25.    Not giving to support religion when able:
26.    Keeping over-change given by a clerk in mistake:
27.    Copying from another’s paper in a school examination:
28.    Speeding away after one’s car knocks down a pedestrian:
29.    ch‎arging interest above a fair rate when lending money:
30.    Falsifying a federal income tax return:
31.    Buying bootleg liquor under prohibition law:
32.    Married persons using birth - control devices:
33.    Seeking divorce because of incompatibility when both parties agree to separate (assuming no children):
34.    Depositing more than one ballot in an election in order to aid a favorite candidate:
35.    Living on inherited wealth without attempting to render service to others:
36.    Taking one’s own life (assuming no near relatives or dependents):
37.    Using profane or blasphemous speech:
38.    Being habitually cross or disagree able to members of one’s own family:
39.    Seeking amusement on Sunday instead of going to church:
40.    Refusing to bear arms in a war one believes to be unjust:
41.    Advertising a medicine to cure a disease known to be in curable by such a remedy:
42.    42. Misrepresenting the value of an investment in order to induce credulous persons to invest:
43.    Taking money for one’s vote in an election:
44.    Newspapers treating crime news so as to make hoodlums and gangsters appear heroic:
45.    A man ha‎ving a vacant building he cannot rent sets it on fire to collect insurance:
46.    Nations at war using poison gas on the homes and cities of its enemy behind the lines:
47.    Slipping out secretly and going among people when one’s home is under quarantine for a contagious disease:
48.    A man deserting a girl whom he has got into trouble without himself taking responsibility:
49.    Disbelieving in God:
50.    A man not marrying a girl he loves because she is markedly his inferior socially and in education:
شرح سایت روان سنجی: این مقیاس با شش عامل "کلی"، "مذهبی"، "خانوادگی"، "پیوریتتانی "، "بهره جویی سودجویانه"، "اقتصادی" و استثمارگرانه" به سنجش اخلاق می پردازد.
Factor .A‚ a general factor‚ as basic morality; factor B‚ as religious morality; factor C‚ as family morality; factor D‚ as puritanical morality; factor E‚ as exploitative- manipulative morality; and Factor F‚ as economic morality; Factor E ‚exploitative-manipulative morality
اعتبار: سایت روان سنجی اطلاعاتی ندارد.
نمره گذاری:
1= ''least wrong"‚ to 10= "least right
چگونگی دستیابی
This instrument can be found at: https://etd.ohiolink.edu/!etd.send_file?accession=osu1486482884008401&disposition=inline
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Crissman‚ P. (1942). Temporal changes and sexual difference in moral judgments. J. of Soc. Psychol‚ 16‚ 29-33.
Crissman‚ P. (1950). Temporal changes and sexual difference in moral /judgments. Univ. of Wyoming Publication‚ 15‚ 57-63.
Rawson‚ H. E. (1959). Maximal Prediction of Risk-Taking Behavior Using Personality and Socioeconomic Measures. Unpbl. MlA.' thesis‚ The Ohio State University
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Changes in moral values over three decades. 1929-1953. Social Problems. 6‚ 320-323.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Changes in moral values‚ among college‚ students: a factorial study. Amer. Soc. Review‚ 24‚ 356-363.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Changes in moral values as a function of adult socialization. .Social Problems‚ 7‚ 117-125.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1959). Moral codes of American and Korean college students. J. of Soc:. Psychol‚ 50‚ 65-73.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1960). Differences in the structure of moral judgments of students and alumni. Amer. Soc. Review‚ 25. 550-555.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1960). Moral codes of American and foreign academic intellectuals in an American university. J. of Soc. Psychol‚ 51‚ 229-244.
Rettig‚ S. and Pasamanick‚ B. (1961). Moral value structure and social class. Sociometry‚ 24‚ 21-35.
Rawson‚ Harve Else. (1961). The relationships of moral value dimensions and Unethical behavior: under varying conditions of risk. Doctoral dissertation‚ The Ohio State University