Scriptural Literalism Scale

Scriptural Literalism Scale
Hogge & Friedman‚ 1967
مقیاس لفظ گرایی کتاب مقدس
1.    Life originated differently than is suggested by the Scriptures. *
2.    The precise words spoken by God may be found in the Scriptures.
3.    The Scriptures contain God’s rules for living.
4.    The Scriptures are a product of man’s imagination. *
5.    The Scriptures should be taken as divinely-inspired writings.
6.    The Scriptures contain religious truths.
7.    The Scriptures should be regarded more as beautiful writing than as religious truths. *
8.    The scriptural account of creation is accurate.
9.    Quotations appearing in the Scripture are accurate.
10.    We can put our trust in the teachings of the Scriptures.
11.    Most of the writing in the Scriptures should be taken literally.
12.    The miracles reported in the Scriptures actually occurred.
13.    The miracles reported in the Scriptures actually occurred.                   
14.    The Scriptures are the ultimate truth.
15.    The Scriptures accurately predict future events.
16.    The Scriptures are a collection of myths. *
17.    There are more accurate accounts of history than the Scriptures. *
* indicates items that are reverse scored
شرح سایت روان سنجی: این مقیاس میزان اعتقاد فرد به تفسیر تحت اللفظی و الام گرفته از کتاب مقدس را اندازه گیری می کند.
شواهد روان سنجی: اعتبار دو نیمه کردن 0.9، اعتبار اسپیرمن-براون 0.95
نمره گذاری:
1= strongly disagree‚ moderately disagree‚ disagree‚ agree‚ moderately agree‚ 6= strongly agree
چگونگی دستیابی
This instrument can be found at:  https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Bob-Lew/post/How_to_measure_Religiosity/attachment/59d63ba779197b8077998ace/AS%3A419378475618305%401476999028454/download/Measures+of+Religiosity%2C+Hill+%26+Hood+%281999%29%2C+pp+001-100.pdf#page=45 & https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.1967.10544905
منبع برای آگاهی بیشتر
Hogge‚ J. H.‚ & Friedman‚ S. T. (1967). The scriptural literalism scale: A preliminary report. The Journal of Psychology‚ 66‚ 275-279.
Jennings‚ F. L. (1972). A note on the reliability of several brief scales. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion‚ 11‚ 157-164.
Hill‚ Peter C. and Hood Jr‚ Ralph W. (1999). Measures of religiosity. Religiou Education Press.
   
آذر 1402
خرداد 1396
اسفند 1395
فروردین 1394
خرداد 1393
فروردین 1393
اسفند 1392
بهمن 1392
آذر 1390
تیر 1390
خرداد 1390
اردیبهشت 1390
اردیبهشت 1390
بهمن 1389
اردیبهشت 1389
اردیبهشت 1389
آبان 1388
شهریور 1388
مرداد 1388
تیر 1388
خرداد 1388
   
سپاس بیکران به زنده یاد دکترحیدر علی هومن روان سنجی که دارای دانش عظیم بود .
   
کلیه حقوق به آرین آرانی متعلق است.